By Michael Skerker
The act of interrogation, and debate over its use, pervade our tradition, even if via fictionalized depictions in video clips and tv or discussions of real-life interrogations at the information. yet regardless of day-by-day mentions of the perform within the media, there's a loss of knowledgeable statement on its ethical implications. relocating past the slim specialise in torture that has characterised such a lot paintings at the topic, An Ethics of Interrogation is the 1st publication to totally deal with this advanced factor. In doing so Michael Skerker confronts a bunch of philosophical and criminal matters, from the correct to privateness and the privilege opposed to forced self-incrimination to prisoner rights and the felony effects of other modes of arrest, interrogation, and detention. those subject matters elevate severe questions about the morality of retaining secrets and techniques and the variations among kingdom strength at domestic and in another country. considerate attention of those topics leads Skerker to express coverage techniques for legislation enforcement, army, and intelligence professionals.
Read Online or Download An Ethics of Interrogation PDF
Similar criminal law books
Andrew von Hirsch addresses a few rising conceptual questions about the proportionality of legal sentences, an method that's gaining impact around the globe together with in England the place the felony Justice Act of 1991 made proportionality the first criterion for picking out sentences.
E-book through Jerry Ahern
Felony Lawis a relied on, transparent and fascinating rationalization of the most ideas and offences of legal legislation. This e-book lighting a transparent course via a space that has skilled a lot swap, explaining the legislations because it stands but additionally contemplating proposals for reform in order that the reader profits an knowing of the advance of the legislations.
Extra resources for An Ethics of Interrogation
Yet he could be mistaken about what his neighbors would be able to hear. He is not violating their rights if he is not intentionally trying to bother them or acting negligently, but rather, materially infringing on their rights—potentially causing them an undeserved harm. His neighbors could demand that he alter his behavior in deference to their rights in such a situation. In addition to well-intentioned errors, it is also possible that autonomous people will choose to violate their neighbors’ rights.
This is simply an expression of any person’s freedom to do things she wishes that are nonprejudicial to other’s rights. In this case, Jones happens to want to protect Livingston. Coercion exercised against an offender, limited in the appropriate ways, does not violate the offender’s rights—because he never had a right to those unjust actions in the first place—so Jones may exercise proportionate coercion against Young to aid Livingston. Jones’s action may be motivated by self-interest as well. In violating Livingston’s rights, Young wrongs more than Livingston; he indirectly wrongs all other persons in the sense that Young arrogates to himself more freedom than is consistent with universal exercise.
As we begin to get more specific regarding the scope of the coercive power implied by autonomy now, bear in mind the following fanciful thought experiment. Fed up with run-ins with the Vallejo police department, Livingston moves to presently lawless territory in western Afghanistan. Here he will experience real freedom, he thinks, with no government to push him around. He can do any drug he wants, own and shoot any kind of gun he wants, drive without a seatbelt, etc. Livingston realizes the land is rife with bandits, but he plans to hire some bodyguards and build a fortified compound.